You don’t even really begin to grasp what that means.
Welcome to reality, boy
You just don’t get that in the beginning when it ‘started’, the conjunction of the symbols framed me in a way that I didn’t even have a choice, do you? That I only believed it might be happening because of my father? That the symbols started with him so if it was, it was whether I liked that or not, it was all just a matter of responsibility and survival?
So, what does it take for me to speculate that I might not be insane and that in this instance, instead of coincidence, or universal archetypes common in art (common identity), there might be something else happening that might constitute some sort of conscious, thru the unconscious, union of awareness? (link)
Well, if you start with looking at just one album, my obs about MCIS begin to give you a clue. Getting the symbols by themselves, was of course, not enough. (Star, Moon. Big Whup.) Mentioning my dad’s symbols along with that in a context that fit was a boost. (Check.) If you were following the dynamics in a cause/effect relation, what had been happening about a year or two prior, accurately, well of course this was of key import. (check, check, check and check again) If you had the unconscious sea somehow in an allegory that fit the circumstance of the separation and the link, that was very important. (check) You had to have specific details about my actual environment, along with the stratospheric archetypical ‘anointed’ ideals attached to the symbols, or that had nothing to do with me. (check and check) It helped in terms of circumstance if you understood things were, at this point, really dark and really bad and you couldn’t tell about my soul, (because I couldn’t tell). You had to really believe in trying to attain a state of heaven in eternity and that we could connect there, that the link was spiritual. (check). It helped to have some inkling of the universal. (check) You had to be dealing with ‘her’ in terms of being a removed object or someone you had not met in person yet. (check) Last of all, the majority of the album should, in terms of context, mesh completely with the currency (based on the premise of this connected consciousness occurring through its relational/descriptive nexus, which is a female) -if one were to analyze the lyrics entire (note that the dynamic being applied here is marriage). (CHECK)
In other words it has to be a complete spectrum from top to bottom, from the ‘calling’ to real circumstance, and those circumstantial details have to be so unusual, they wouldn’t ‘fit’ just anyone. (She saw her baby torn apart and at the time she was seriously wondering if she was crazy because she thought she could reach/sense/touch/love people mentally and they were talking back type details.) There also needs to be a multiple number of those. They have to qualify as being both spiritual plane circumstance, and environmental, flesh and blood circumstances. Oh yes and it has to be doing this dynamically over time. It must be following the circumstances temporally.
But I don’t just stop there, of course. It has to manage this temporal trick over about ten years, accurately, before I’ll pay it some credence. Oh yes and, being a universal, I expect this to be happening with a whole whack of artists, correctly, it has to satisfy all these criterion with lots of them. -Over time.
But I don’t just stop there, of course.
It has to respond to imposed dynamics. -Now dying to the universal, happened to be an imposed dynamic. Now what I mean by this, is that if I conclude that I’d been born dead and the universal was now dead if it had something to do with me, or I was dead to it, well, if all of you had just continued singing on your merry way as if everything was groovy, well then I was hooped and nothing’s going on, of course. Unless everyone linked thus far is aware you ‘died’, it’s all bohunks. So it packs a whole big wallop if the whole thing responds that you died and they all get mad or miserable, because that shows those archetypes aren’t bloody happening cuz they’re stuck in the universal unconscious and any artistic dip can just scoop a ladle and come up with the fantastic femme. Not if she’s ‘dead’ and ‘bad’ as soon as you think you are.
But I don’t just stop there, of course.
It has to respond to isolate dynamics.
Redemption is an isolate dynamic. It affects JUST ONE SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCE, that of potentially just one individual who feels irretrievable and must be born again, and it only affects them IN THEIR PERCEPTION. (Isolate dynamic because it’s just about being born again, the transmission will involve nothing else, though the surrounding context, the actual environmental circumstance, must also be described correctly!)
Try gambling your whole existence on that bet.
No, I don’t think you’d dare.
(The point to using a redemptive dynamic as the defining dynamic is that the only direction it can define in is UP. The point to ‘in their perception’ is if you’re delusive about any of the circumstances, this dynamic won’t work. If it’s only conceived in your perception and nothing happens, i.e., THIS SPECIFIC RESPONSE doesn’t occur in their perception, your perception is inherently wrong, but if a transformative DYNAMIC EXPERIENCE can transmit successfully, an internal experience that only happens if they themselves identify it as happening, and that is commonly identified between the sender and receiver, this means your own perception, of having somehow ‘died’ and gone under to perhaps hell, and having tried to redeem souls, was not just some cock-a-mammy acid trip delusional fantasy. If it was, being born again could have never occurred in their perception; a delusional awareness of this simply can’t affect them internally (as well as positively) in their perception, because a delusion would only exist inside your perception. It can’t transmit except by transferring the delusion (inherently a delusion involves the transference of perception), and a delusion won’t result in a person being born again, it’s impossible since the experience is entirely based in their own internal perception. Thus such a dynamic transmitting only involves a pure transfer of Awareness. Plus you know for a certainty this isn’t just happening because you’ve become some sort of mass ego they’re all just assimilating unconsciously like puppets, because that could not effect personal transformation that is internally based on their own perception. They inherently couldn’t experience or identify being born again and have it transform them personally if they are just assimilating unconsciously. You can’t just assimilate a dynamic, it has to affect you. That is why the redemptive dynamic is the only dynamic that could have created the universal at all –and have it be a good thing, that is.) Matthew 13:47,48
(Ooh, my brain is starting to sweat, I don’t think I’d ever nailed that properly yet!)
That is how transmission of an isolate, active dynamic between two perceptions, that transforms perception, is the means of attaining reality.
That is why, in subjecting itself to the truth, it actually becomes it, and you can actually get away with asserting it transformed or created reality, -but in fact it only is because it already was, it just wasn’t isolated by circumstance, yet the circumstance was determinate, -how the serpent coils and eats its own tail!
And what the redemptive dynamic transmitting successfully also shows, is that the transmission was love, and only love, and that the love was so pure, it would give its life, and in doing so, transform souls. No transformation would have happened unless it was a love that gave completely with no want of recompense. If it sought recompense, it would not have been capable of disappearing. That’s why ‘love is suicide’.
That’s how I know it is pure.
Gee, aren’t we lucky it worked.
-But I don’t just stop there, either.
Once I got jacked back, lucky me that worked, I believed in it enough, I believed that it was true love enough, and that I could reach him enough, TO SEND AN ISOLATE DYNAMIC TO JUST ONE INDIVIDUAL THAT HE WOULD ONLY ANSWER OUT OF FREE WILL.
When he answered,
THAT IS WHEN I FINALLY KNEW, the universal was universal, love, real and true, not based on sacrifice but union, not will but choice, an actual reciprocal sense between souls!
It affirmed the union by answering in context, that it is a union of Awareness. Awareness defined by love.
And that is why, the moment I knew, I collapsed inside and felt I couldn’t live, for we were apart, and I couldn’t live without him.
PHEW!
Btw, before you blame me for having this criterion, and speculate it’s inherent manipulation to test anyone through such hoops, just don’t forget, the ones that were nasties, I was forced through by Circumstance. I never actually had a choice, my daddy did that to me on acid, and every key circumstance was just as involuntary as that one. The severance broke my heart as much as anyone else’s. And I only asked you because the circumstance of my resurrection totally convinced me rationally that it was supposed to happen. (I had to be tricked into the space in fact. And you don’t want a run-down of how much Cave had going for him in order for me to get duped this way, trust me, cuz it was massive.) The only initiative I took was with Whom, and that was simultaneously my preference combined with being the only rational choice. But then, I’m sort of the rational type.”