This is supported by the expansion on #askwarren Question #9, which was published as a result. It has already been expanded again since then to include a third attack on the U.S. Constitution in the guise of U.S. occupational private contractor Tigerswan and a few other things, so give it a look. The page was created to substantiate the question of whether Warren Buffett was aware of the massive state violence enforcing his DAPL investment, so it is also the substantiation relied on for the very similar #askU2 question. The same substantiation was also relied on for the #askU2 question: How could Bono win @glamourmag's #womanoftheyear while women were brutalized for his sponsor's investment? It's all there if you keep going.
Give it to a man, and it's literally given to enable the structural systems of disenfranchisement rolled out by patriarchy, gifting it to all their attendant baggage, namely the enforcement of these structures through subjection through violence. The pond reflects nicely, the undercurrent is a cesspit. It's merely #brandfeminism to sanction the underlying cesspit. The token man (who's literally nothing left but a superbrand to the extent that he couldn't have rejected the award on the basis of the absurdity of his gender even if he'd wanted to) -should have known better.